The Centers For Disease
Control (CDC) recently came out with a set of guidelines for gradually phasing
in a return to work and school. The Trump Administration quashed the document
and said it would never see the light of day. Fortunately, it
has been leaked, and you can read it here. Unfortunately, many of the
guidelines will probably never be enacted, let alone enforced. This is partly
because the document has been suppressed, and partly because many of the recommendations
would be impossible for schools and workplaces to enact. Consequently, it must be concluded
that it is not safe to reopen schools for in-person learning (and many other workplaces) and will not be
safe to do so until the pandemic is over.
One of the
recommendations is that when children return to school, social mixing should be
reduced as much as possible. That means the same group of kids and adults
remains together throughout the day. Rather than eating in the cafeteria, they
remain in their classroom to eat. Rather than having several periods a day, as
is the norm in most secondary classrooms, the same group of students should
remain in the same classroom all day. Doing this reduces the number of
different social contacts children and adults would have each day and, consequently,
the potential for infection. It would also allow custodians to disinfect classrooms
in between periods, which would not be possible under a typical bell schedule,
with students changing classrooms every 45-55 minutes in dozens of rooms per
school site.
However, none of the
proposals for reopening the schools that I have seen suggest anything like
this. They propose sending kids to school twice a week, and staying home the
other 3 days. Secondary teachers typically teach 5 different classes per day.
If the CDC recommendation was followed, that could have students attending
school 5 days per week, each day attending a different period. For example, students
who have English 1st period would spend the entire day with their 1st
period teacher and do a week’s worth of lessons in that one day.
The problem is that
this does not take into account social distancing, which is also recommended by
the CDC. Students should not sit within six feet of anyone else. If only 10
students are possible per classroom to ensure six feet of space between them,
that would mean that one-third, or fewer, of the students in a typical
California classroom would be able to attend at any one time. This, in turn,
would have students attending each class once every three weeks.
Another challenge for
schools is arrival and departure. Typically, these times of the day create
traffic and pedestrian bottlenecks, as hundreds of students attempt to get to
class on time. The CDC’s recommendation is to stagger drop off and pick up
times, which further complicates how to schedule classes. Although this could
be achieved by scheduling student drop off and pick up by teacher (since they’d
be staying with the same teacher all day) and staggering each teacher’s start
time. Of course, this works much more easily in the K-5 grades, where students
are already remaining with the same teacher all day.
Another recommendation
is that students do not share anything, including electronic devices. That means
every student would have to be provided their own laptop or chromebook. As it
currently stands, schools that are fortunate enough to have a technology
budget, are lucky if they have a class set for each classroom. Most do not. But
even for those schools that do, that means potentially 5 or more students
typically handling the same computer keyboard, spreading germs along the way.
So, schools would have to come up with the funding to quintuple (or more than
quintuple) their current computer stockpiles.
The CDC recommends
daily health screenings for students and staff, including temperature checks.
Doing this has clear and obvious benefits in reducing the risk of disease
transmission. It could also add hours to everyone’s work/school day. While the
screening might only take a few minutes per person, it could take an hour or
more before all of a teacher’s students were screened and ready to enter their
classroom.
Whenever a student or staff
member displays signs of Covid-19 infection, they are to be isolated in a special
area of the school that has been set aside for this purpose. Appropriate sites
may not exist at all schools, particularly overcrowded ones. Further, any area
used by the sick person (e.g., their classroom) should be closed off and not entered
for another 24 hours, at which point it must be thoroughly disinfected. This
would further reduce available classroom space and potentially the number of
children who could attend school. It could even result in the entire school site
shutting down for several days, or longer.
Each school site should
have a Covid-19 point-person who monitors all absences, looks for trends that
may indicate a local outbreak, reports these trends to authorities, ensures
that adequate measure are taken when such trends are identified, and responds
to staffs concerns about the pandemic. Schools do not have people who are
trained to do this. Many schools do not even have a staff member who is free to
do this, assuming they were provided training, as all staff members already
have too many other responsibilities.
It is recommended that
schools have a back-up roster of trained individuals, in case regular staff
members get sick. This, of course, is a fantasy. Most school districts do not
have a sufficient supply of substitute teachers under normal conditions. Quite
often, school districts inform their employees not to take personal days on
Mondays and Fridays because of this problem. Fairly often, when a teacher gets
sick in the middle of the night, there are no substitutes available the next
morning, and their classes must be covered by their colleagues during their
prep periods. Furthermore, virtually no substitutes are actually trained as
teachers or have credentials that qualify them to teach any subject. So, when
too many teachers get sick, classes may end up just being canceled.
Vulnerable workers are
supposed to be given duties that minimize their contact with the public. This includes
anyone older than 65 (as is the case for many school staff members), and anyone
with heart, liver, kidney or lung disease, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, or weakened
immune systems. Such workers are to self-identify and employers are not to pry
into their medical history. At schools, this could include significant portions
of the staff, including teachers and administrators. Obviously, continuing to
do Distance Learning at home solves this problem. Indeed, the CDC recommends
that employers support their right to telework. But if schools are compelled to
reopen for in-person learning, and all vulnerable staff members exercise their
right to not be exposed to the public, they will likely have insufficient
numbers of staff to actually reopen.
Lastly, and most significantly,
the CDC document talks about phases, but does not define what these phases are.
More alarmingly, epidemiologists and pandemic experts say that nothing should
be reopened until new infection rates have dropped dramatically, which has not
happened anywhere in the U.S. University
of Washington scientist say the rate of new infections should drop to 1 new
case per 1 million residents. They also say that there should be regular,
repeated, universal testing, combined with contact tracing and mandatory
quarantines before things reopen. Doing this makes it possible to isolate the
majority of infectious individuals, significantly reducing the chances of
further spread.
However, none of these
recommendations are happening anywhere in the country, and they are unlikely to
be in place by August-September, when schools typically reopen for their fall
semesters. In most communities, neither the funding, nor their technical
capacity are in place for this level of testing and tracing, let alone
quarantine enforcement. Consequently, if will NOT be safe for children or staff
to return to school sites in the fall, even if these other CDC recommendations
were implemented.
No comments:
Post a Comment