Dear Superintendent and School Board,
It is not too late to reverse the irresponsible and potentially deadly plan
to reopen our schools this month. Considering what we are already seeing
throughout Europe and parts the U.S., with the much more infectious and deadly
UK variant driving new surges, with school
outbreaks already are the largest source of new infections in places like Michigan
and Illinois,
the most prudent, compassionate and rational policy would be to keep our
schools closed, at least until the end of this school year.
As a former scientist in the infectious disease department of UCSF, I can
say with confidence and without bias or exaggeration, that the “science” you
are getting from the CDC, from the Department of Education, and from the County
Board of Health, is both incomplete and biased. Each of these agencies is getting
immense pressure from the federal and local governments to provide data that justifies
school reopenings. Consequently, their scientists are falling into similar
patterns as those scientists working for the tobacco companies who found data
to support their claim that smoking really wasn’t that dangerous to smokers or
the people around them, and those working for fossil fuel companies who found data
supporting their claim that fossil fuels really weren’t so bad for the
environment.
For example, the CDC is expected to loosen its guidelines and say that 3
feet of social distancing is safe. But in order to justify this policy, they cited
a study published last week in Clinical Infectious Diseases, in which
the authors claim that the new “three-feet rule” was proven safe in
Massachusetts, because enarly 100% of residents wear masks. Yet, in the 251
school districts observed in this study, “4,226
cases were reported in students and 2,382 in school staff.” Furthermore,
the study did not involve contact tracing or surveillance testing, so we have
no idea how many thousands more people in the general community were infected
as a result of their contacts with these infected students and staff members,
nor how many hundreds died, as a result. And most significantly, the study was conducted prior to the spread of the more
infectious and lethal B.1.1.7 variant of the virus, rendering it completely irrelevant
and meaningless under today’s
conditions, where that variant is quickly becoming the dominant variant across
the country.
Indeed, nearly all of the studies that are cited to justify school
reopenings are based on data collected prior to the
emergence of the UK variant. Furthermore, they never define “safe.”
To most parents, a safe school means one where the risk of injury or death is negligible.
We can safely and honestly promise them that their kids won’t catch measles or
polio because no one is permitted on campus who hasn’t been vaccinated against
those diseases. We can not honestly say that with covid. In fact, it is entirely
hypocritical, not to mention a logical contradiction, to require vaccines for
other deadly diseases that are not presently at pandemic levels, while not
requiring vaccines for covid, which is still at extremely high levels in the
community.
Lastly, in all of the studies cited to justify the claim that it is “safe”
to return to school, infections and outbreaks still occurred at schools. Even
with the best mitigation efforts in place, asymptomatic and presymptomatic
people continue to come onto school campuses and expose other people. Even with
masks and six feet of distancing, some virus particles make it into the common
air and onto common surfaces. And those infected individuals take the germs
home with them, into grocery stores, playgrounds, barbershops and malls,
infecting family and community members, contributing to new surges, as we are
seeing in Michigan, Illinois, Italy, Brazil, Germany, Poland and France.
But even if you choose to ignore the misery and deaths that occur in the
general community as a result of school outbreaks, as the government
scientists, politicians and media are doing, you surely must care about the
misery and suffering of our own students. And this risk has been grossly
misrepresented by the politicians and media. Consider that as of March 11,
there have been 3.28 million children infected with
Covid in the U.S. alone, according to
the latest
data from the American Academy of Pediatrics. And, according to this study,
published last week in The Lancet, it is estimated that 13% of 2-10 year-olds,
and 15%
of 12-16 year-olds, who catch covid have at least one significant symptom five
weeks after testing positive. The authors go on to say, “Given uncertainty
around the long-term health effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection, it would be unwise to let the virus circulate in children,
with consequent risk to their families… By contributing to high community
transmission, it also provides fertile ground for virus evolution and new
variants.”
Doing the math, if only 10 students catch covid at our schools over the next
6 weeks, which would be a pretty good record considering we’ve already had 2
infected students on campus, just at BHS, and during a period of extremely low
human density on our campuses, 1-2 of those students would become too sick to
return to school this school year, having at least one significant symptom well
into their summer vacation. And that suffering would be entirely the fault of
the irresponsible and senseless reopening of our schools. Furthermore, 5 weeks
is just the tip of the iceberg. Kids
do get “long haul” syndrome. Consequently, students infected now could be
too sick to return in the fall. Consider that at least one of our teachers
still has symptoms, more than six months after catching covid last summer.
Thank you, once again, for your time and consideration.
Michael Dunn
Parent and Science Teacher, BHS
No comments:
Post a Comment